USA Finance

Nov 14 2017

Insanity Defense #criminal #law, #criminal #trial, #criminal #procedure


Insanity Defense

A criminal defendant who is found to have been legally insane when he or she committed a crime may be found not guilty by reason of insanity. In some cases, the defendant may be found guilty but sentenced to a less severe punishment due to a mental impairment. In states that allow the insanity defense, defendants must prove to the court that they did not understand what they were doing; failed to know right from wrong; acted on an uncontrollable impulse or some variety of these factors.

Below you will find basic information and legal issues related to the insanity defense, plus links to FindLaw’s various articles about legal insanity. See Defending Yourself Against a Criminal Charge for related information.

Legal Insanity: Background

The first known recognition of insanity as a defense to criminal charges was recorded in a 1581 English legal treatise stating that, If a madman or a natural fool, or a lunatic in the time of his lunacy kills someone, they cannot be held accountable. British courts came up with the wild beast test in the 18th Century, in which defendants were not to be convicted if they understood the crime no better than an infant, a brute, or a wild beast.

Besides the fact that courts no longer use the terms lunatic or wild beast, current laws allowing for the insanity defense follow a similar logic. The legal basis for insanity was codified into British law in the mid 19th Century with the M’Naughten Rule, which is used in a majority of U.S. states and other jurisdictions around the world today.

How Courts Test for Legal Insanity

Depending on the jurisdiction, courts use one or a combination of the following tests for legal insanity:

  • The M’Naghten Rule – Defendant either did not understand what he or she did, or failed to distinguish right from wrong, because of a disease of mind.
  • The Irresistible Impulse Test – As a result of a mental disease, defendant was unable to control his impulses, which led to a criminal act.
  • The Durham Rule – Regardless of clinical diagnosis, defendant’s mental defect resulted in a criminal act.
  • The Model Penal Code Test for Legal Insanity – Because of a diagnosed mental defect, defendant either failed to understand the criminality of his acts, or was unable to act within the confines of the law.

The Insanity Defense: State Laws

A few states do not allow the insanity defense against criminal charges, including Idaho, Kansas, Montana, and Utah. All four of these states, with the exception of Kansas, allow guilty but insane verdicts, which often provide for institutionalization in lieu of prison. Most states that recognize legal insanity use either the M’Naghten Rule (sometimes in combination with the Irrestistible Impulse Test) or the Model Penal Code. Only New Hampshire uses the Durham standard.

Get a Free Legal Review

If you are wondering whether your case will qualify for an insanity defense, you’ll need to know your state laws and whether they follow the M’Naghten Rule or the Model Penal Code. You don’t have to do this alone. Start learning more today by contacting a criminal defense attorney in your area for a free case review.

Written by admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *